The Leader Of The British Labor Party Refused To Raise Taxes And Proposed A Coalition Between The Left And Business People.
2021-02-18 | by CusiGO
When your opponent, Boris Johnson’s conservative party, abandoned fiscal discipline and used the Treasury in response to the epidemic, the Labor Party’s response can only be radical. Literally, this is just the root of the problem. Labor leader Keir Starmer put forward the opposition’s economic proposals on Thursday to get rid of Britain’s biggest recent crisis and exude the flavor of Tony Blair’s new labor party. There has been no increase in taxes, no search for alliances with entrepreneurs to lift the country out of socio-economic inequality, which has multiplied the death toll on the 19th.
“We can go back to the same economy that caused insecurity and injustice in the past, be exposed to the virus in a particularly cruel way, or seize this moment and move towards a completely different future from the past.”, ‘it doesn’t help the indifference of the videoconference,’ stammer said in an epic tone.
A year after being elected leader of the party, stammer rejected the left-wing form and message of his predecessor, Jeremy corbyn, and is expected to make a mandatory response to the budget draft to be submitted by the Johnson Administration in early March in order to regain the initiative in the public debate. Economy minister Rishi sunak is under conservative pressure to restore fiscal discipline, and the specter of further cuts can only be achieved by raising taxes. In their search for a subversive current president, opposition leaders opposed the possibility: “this is not the time to raise taxes on businesses and families. We’re going to waste the sacrifices we made last year and stifle our recovery, “stammer said.
He didn’t elaborate on his proposal, but labour tried to consolidate his speech with two reports vital to British history. One is the glorious legend of the past. The other is to denounce the secret, which explains why the pandemic is so rampant in the UK. On the one hand, stammer called for the Beveridge Report, a text developed by liberal politician William Beveridge at the end of the Second World War, which laid the foundation for the welfare state and established social security or national health service (NHS).
On the other hand, he drew on the research of epidemiologist Sir Michael Marmot, director of the Institute of health equity in health, which established post equity: covid-19 marmot review, which reviews the previous article that denounced the health situation in the country at the beginning of the last conservative period. Its conclusions partly explain the tragic gap between the United Kingdom and other European countries in the fight against the epidemic. Regional marginalization and poverty, obesity, diabetes, alcoholism, family crowding in second-class housing, workers have no choice but to leave home to earn income. Life expectancy has stagnated for ten years, and has fallen to five years in some areas. The most serious victims are ethnic minorities and ethnic minorities, who have been beaten by the virus. Northern and central England, as well as at least 10 London suburbs, have significantly higher infection rates than southern England.
“Covid-19 has slipped out of the cracks and fissures in our society and forced it to open, with tragic consequences,” stammer condemned. “This is the inevitable result of the ten-year decision-making. The guiding ideology of these decisions is that the government cannot intervene in the market (…). The epidemic has opened, showing us what has happened so far. ”
Stammer’s proposal did not arouse the interest of critics in the party. The powerful remnants of corbinism accused the current leader of right deviation and weak attack on Johnson. They don’t like his idea of “embracing entrepreneurs and building new alliances with them and citizens.”. Opposition leaders propose to maintain and expand the tax cuts, direct aid and ETS currently approved by the conservative government. Reducing the debt burden of many enterprises, debt postponement is similar to the situation of college students now: they pay off their debts only when they start to have new income. “His speech didn’t show any ambition or substance. “We can’t simply promise that we will better manage the same system and win 2024,” internal labor momentum, which has been Jeremy corbyn’s most loyal ally for years, responded.
However, the British business community welcomed the opposition leader’s words. “It’s been an incredibly difficult 12 months, and stammer’s suggestions to help people start their own businesses are particularly popular,” said Mike cherry, chairman of the small business association. British companies.
Stammer is very cautious in form and presence. He believes that the labor party can return to the government only when the public thinks that the Labor Party has the ability to seriously manage the economy. Polls show that the labor party is gradually approaching the conservative party, although Johnson still keeps the lead. “As long as I am in power, the primary task of the Labour Party will always be financial responsibility. I take people’s efforts to make money very seriously, and I know they want the government to be just as careful. “Invest wisely and don’t spend money we can’t afford,” he said
Stammer retracted Prime Minister Harold Wilson’s words, promising that “the labor party can only be a moral crusade, or nothing” and trying to convince British progressive voters that “you can’t go back to the past” and that the country needs a revolution. However, it faces a speech like Johnson’s, which basically offers the same commitment to big investment and greater regional equality. It’s a dilemma about the trust that one or another leader can convey. As Philip Collins, author of some of Tony Blair’s most memorable speeches, tweeted, “it’s hard for labor to find fair criticism and to act on a government that is culturally right-wing and economically left-wing.”